Unifying the Tenant Verification Experience on Spotahome

Industry:

Lodging & Real Estate

Project type:

UX Design

UI Design

Role:

UX Designer

UI Designer

Deliverables:

Hi-fi prototype

Timeline:

1 month

Problem:

Fragmented, external, and invisible verification process

Fragmented, external, and invisible verification process

Spotahome is an online marketplace offering verified rentals across 100 European cities. Its Plus-tier verification (a booking-specific, post-confirmation process) is handled externally through email rather than natively in the app. Users receive conflicting instructions across multiple channels with no platform-native progress visibility.

Spotahome is an online marketplace offering verified rentals across 100 European cities. Its Plus-tier verification (a booking-specific, post-confirmation process) is handled externally through email rather than natively in the app. Users receive conflicting instructions across multiple channels with no platform-native progress visibility.

Solution:

Unifying the process to live within the platform

Unifying the process to live within the platform

Through Heuristic Evaluation and Cognitive Walkthrough, I identified critical frictions in Spotahome's Plus verification flow and redesigned the experience to live natively within the booking panel, unifying fragmented email communications into a single, transparent on-platform flow with clear step tracking and contextual guidance for users.

Through Heuristic Evaluation and Cognitive Walkthrough, I identified critical frictions in Spotahome's Plus verification flow and redesigned the experience to live natively within the booking panel, unifying fragmented email communications into a single, transparent on-platform flow with clear step tracking and contextual guidance for users.

Process:

Usability Testing
& Evaluation

Design Solution

Information Architecture

Prototype

Outcomes
& Reflections

  1. Usability Testing & Evaluation

The tenant verification process requires users to submit personal documents, proof of income, and set up monthly payment method after a booking in the Plus tier is accepted. Given the emotional and financial weight of this action, the experience demands clear guidance and reliable feedback. As both Nielsen's Heuristic Evaluation and users’ feedback across various community forums platforms reveal, the current implementation falls short in two critical areas:

  • Weak Visibility of System Status

  • Weak Visibility of System Status

Users receive inconsistent confirmation feedback through emails, meanwhile, the site itself remained completely static throughout, never reflecting any of the steps being carried out over email.

  • Lack of Consistency and Standard

  • Lack of Consistency and Standard

The Standard and Plus verification processes follow entirely different interaction models. The switch feels both inconsistent and, at times, illegitimate - raising doubts about whether the process is official.

Standard Verification Process is handled natively within the site:

Plus Verification Process is managed externally through email:

  1. Information Architecture

Based on the result of the Heuristic evaluation, I created a light information architecture, translating the solutions into a clear site hierarchy.

  1. Prototype

I translated the Information Architecture set of targeted design decisions. Given the scope of the evaluation, the prototype focuses on the verification flow within the confirmed booking panel, demonstrating the key interaction from summary card to step completion.

Below is the final design prototyped in Figma:

  1. Outcomes & Reflection

Key Outcomes

  • Eliminating fragmentation: Consolidated a fragmented, multi-channel verification process into a single, native flow within the confirmed booking panel.


  • Designed in alignment with Spotahome's existing UI system: matching established typography, components, and visual language. Ensuring the proposed redesign is feasible, consistent, and ready to integrate without requiring additional design infrastructure.

What I would do next time

  • User-test the prototype: Testing was limited by the transactional nature of the product (the verification flow cannot be simulated without a real booking). Next time, I would recruit participants who have recently completed the process to walk through the wireframes and surface blind spots.


  • Formalise user research beyond informal sources: Next time, I would conduct formal interviews or surveys with renters who have completed Plus verification, producing structured, citable evidence with greater methodological credibility.

This design project exemplifies how I can benefit your business.
Contact me if you’re interested in collaborating!

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.